To those who say Octopath is not worth 60 dollars...

[Cerebralbore101]

Wyrdness said:

DonFerrari said:

Using UE4 doesn't make it go to same standard or materials... unless using hammer is all you need for your house to be built with quality.

Majority that bought it didn't though it was too expensive, so that doesn't help your argument at all. Since I didn't say everyone thinks the content is bad or the game is overpriced, did I?

I have no problem with people liking the game or thinking it's price is justified. Don't forget you are the one with pitchfork complaining about people not seeing the same value as you. Have no idea what Neymar have to do with it.

You put content justifies the price, a game being developed for PS1 doesn't make its content any less than if being developed today (still a lot of remasters were revamped and made to a standard above what Octopath reaches and still doesn't retail for 60 usd).

Customer should find reasons to request lower price instead of finding justification to defend devs that charges them.

Your analogy goes on about materials in this case that would be what was used to make the game UE4 which is the same as many AAA games of the same price basically your analogy backfired hard here and the reason why? You never had a viable stance to argue to start off with.

No, in his analogy UE4 is the hammer. The materials are the animations, 3D models, textures etc.