thismeintiel said:
Chris Hu said:
Yeah, nope Disney had a lot of other bombs besides Solo and A Wrinkle in Time recently. Like the Alamo, Mars Needs Moms, John Carter, The Lone Ranger and The Finest Hours just to name a few. And none of those bombed because of SJW. As I said before movies pretty much bomb because they are bad not due to some SJW backlash.
|
Don't see the point you're trying to make with this post. Yes, movies can be just plain bad without SJW messaging. However, when it is so obvious that the focus of the film is to push SJW messaging, you can't conveniently ignore that fact to try and claim that the messaging isn't what made it bad.
Chris Hu said:
But all religions basically are based on myth and legends that involve a battle between good and evil so they really didn't remove the religious references from the movie. Also there are a ton of movies that aren't considered religious that have numerous religious references. For example a lot of Martin Scorsese's movies have a lot of religious references.
|
And I'msure that's the same stretch in logic Disney tried using. Sorry, religion doesn't work that way. They aren't interchangeable and you can't try to make it a general good VS evil story. You can't take a Christian novel and adapt it, taking out all of the Christian references, and expect fans of the book to be fine with it.
|
I haven't watched Solo. What SJW elements does it promote?
