Currently Online 
| Cerebralbore101 said: Easy to do as in it takes hardly any development time. Not easy to do as in computationally demanding. The 3DS games also do something Octopath can't, 3D mode. That puts them on equal footing as far as I'm concerned. Simple 3D models are still harder to implement than simple 2D Alphamaps. You're confusing wasting computational resources with graphical superiority. At it's heart Octopath is a budget AA title, and they want a full on $60 for it. Or do you think that Octopath took just as much time and effort to develop as most other $60 games on Switch? |
No it doesn't because many games don't make use of 3D so when you turn it on it not only makes no difference on what you're seeing those resources aren't being used up so those games would drop even further down graphically if they did so that doesn't salvage your incorrect claim, if a game has better lighting, textures, shadows etc... it's graphically better you're likely talking about your own preference in art direction and mistaking it for graphics, graphics are an objective factor based on the prior mentioned feats whether you prefer something else doesn't really change that objectivity for example a number of people may prefer BOTW's look to Horizon but the latter is still graphically better.
