| Ljink96 said: Well sure, but even that's subjective. I didn't say they couldn't give that as a reason, only that in my opinion it's a silly reason for investors to give that as a claim, when actual sales say otherwise. I'm favoring objective claims over subjective ones. I guess that's what I'm saying. |
Yes, that's why I put it in quotes, because it's subjective. Again, you shouldn't be so adverse to the idea of investors having a "silly reason" when you just said they were out of touch.
Though, quite frankly, I'm not sure how objective you're actually being. I could be wrong, but don't investors calibrate the stock value based on what they're working with now, and not in the future? I'm pretty sure no matter how you cut it, a lot of people thought that E3 presentation was poor, and if they were judging what the stock should be based on that, it's not entirely unreasonable. Just because x big games come out in y months doesn't mean the stock should automatically stay the same or be higher. The stock will probably rise when the releases get closer, and I don't see that as a "blindsiding" of their unreasonableness, more like just common practice.
