By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GOWTLOZ on 07 July 2018
Edit Thread
Chazore said:
GOWTLOZ said:

Production values don't matter when talking of graphics. PUBG is an indie game but it looks nothing like say, Don't Starve.

I prefer 1080p with less graphics than detailed graphics running at 360p to 480p and looking like a blurry mess. Also the game is free while Wolf 2 is $60 on Switch. A platform made to play games and do just that. Its fair to criticise Switch ports when they are of such poor making.

What is wrong with Don't Starve exactly?.

I prefer 1440 with max settings whenever possible, and if performance is hindered with a bad port or bad version of a game, I'll dial back some settings to maintain performance/visuals balances. 

I nabbed Wolf on Steam for less than that, but Skyrim was also £50 on Switch, but obviously the Ninty storefront is not cheap, nor a good comparison to make either. 

It's not fair to downplay Switch and praise mobile though.

Don't Starve isn't a demanding game like PUBG but both are indie games. Indie games vary in their hardware intensiveness so not fair to put them in the same category when talking of graphics. Take a look at Assetto Corsa Competizione. Its an indie game and looks better than anything on the market in its pre alpha state.

Comparison isn't downplaying. I'll criticise Switch when its warranted like I do PS4, Xbox One and PC. Its fair to compare 2 portable platforms.