Third party Switch ports don't necessarily need to sell as much as PS4 to be successful

[DonFerrari]

curl-6 said:

DonFerrari said:

In hindsight almost every decision can be determined good or bad or to show a better one... but at the time they were made I would willy to bet the ones making didn't thought they were bad and considering the general competence companies need to stay afloat (for example like 70% of companies go out of business in their first 1-5 years in Brazil) so no I refuse to accept the idea of they being DUMB. Making mistakes, sure. But being dumb or deciding against their profir because of childish hate is silly pro-Nintendo agenda.

When did I say they were dumb or acting out of childish hate? I simply said that they make mistakes sometimes, like every company and every human being.

Didn't say you said it, but just look to other post I answered here and also a lot of threads were pro-Nintendo fans call devs dumb and hateful for not porting a game over.

zorg1000 said:

areason said:
Yes but given the lack of third party games on the Switch they should do better.

Which games in peticular should be doing better?

Most of the 3rd party support on Switch consists of indies, niche Japanese titles, kid/family titles & late ports/remasters.

None of these are really the type of games that scream huge sales and in most cases are doing pretty well.

If they are those then your measure for success comparing to other platforms already get disproven by you.