vivster said:
So what you're saying is that contrary to the mod note the use of said meme was perfectly fine. Because the context was completely arbitrary and there was no intent or malice towards autistic people. I guess the big question here is if someone has the right to demand action for being offended at something that neither was directed towards them nor was intended to be offensive. The loudest voices in the current society seem to think the answer is a resounding yes, though it's questionable if they reflect the opinion of the majority. My personal opinion on this is that actual intent should have a lot more weight in these situations than it currently has. |
Just because something is completely "arbitrary" doesn't mean it is without harm, which is why a degree of interpretation is required.
And for the record... I -AM- a minority so I know -exactly- what it is like to be on the receiving end of the stick or having your descriptor used in vain, my life also revolves around helping others.
So again... I reinforce the idea that context is most certainly everything.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--