Miyamotoo said:
Lonely_Dolphin said:
Oh they wish we would've forgotten, perhaps that's why they made the Smash segment so long lel. But um yeah, obviously if they made the direct not meh, it wouldn't have been meh. Tis a moot point that doesn't change anything so I'm not sure why yal keep repeating it. | I disagree, E3 Direct was solid until Smash Bros segment, and very long Smash Bros segment effect very negatively on hole E3 Direct, just 5 min long Smash Bros segment definitely would make Direct mush less negative, also point that some things like Fortnite were already leaked didn't help at all.
|
Again, that the event could have been better does not change nor excuse the fact that the event is what it is, but eh fine keep repeating yourself. I won't be saying this again though. Also refer to the quote below as to why the E3 direct was not solid up until Smash.
Nautilus said:
Lonely_Dolphin said:
Hardly, atleast that wouldn't have made a difference to me. Fire Emblem n Yoshi still delayed with Yoshi not even shown, Smash would still get an underwhelming and overly long reveal, more time would still be lost showing off $50 dlc for Let's Go, and Mario Party would remain as the only new announcement from Nintendo while Animal Crossing is vaporware for all we know. | I said it would make the presentation better, not the best.
|
I didn't say anything about being the best, I said it would hardly make a difference. Yes technically it would be better, by like 0.2%. Certainly wouldn't make anyone unhappy with the direct suddenly like it. The loss of surprise factor didn't negatively affect Mario Rabbids any. But eh, I realize this is also a moot point.
Yal are free to believe the 3rd party stuff being unknown beforehand and Smash Ultimate being 5 mins instead woulda made all the difference, doing so won't change anything afterall.
