CGI-Quality said:
My friend, I work with graphics. Daily. I don’t need that video.
Edit: Total Poly Count: 1.05 million, Advanced SSS/AF/Tessellated Character & Tessellated Hair:
Character Poly Count: 329K, No SSS/Low AF/No Tessellation On Character nor Hair: The top image above wouldn't have been possible on any last gen console. The bottom? Easily. And that's one of the thinest examples. Remove all of those advanced features and you're left with a character model that is considerably less detailed. The average person doesn't realize it, but today's games are vastly superior to last gen games. So much going on behind the scenes and in the pipeline. They would have been impossible to do on the PS3 or 360. That's what I'm getting at. No reason for us to not aim for better hardware after the previous has run its course (the PS4 and Xbox One are 5 years old). |
Aside from the ear, and some slight differences in the skin/hair visually it is the same. On a technical level the two models are vastly different, but on a visual level it barely looks improved. A two inch wide 100 sided cylinder looks exactly the same as a two inch wide 10,000 sided cylinder, in a 3D Modeling program. That is especially true once you add smoothing groups. Diminishing returns are a huge problem, when it comes to graphics.
Edit: And that ear only looks better because of a poor retopology job. Add another 2K polys to those ears, and the blockyness goes away. No need to triple the polycount of the entire model.








