| AngryLittleAlchemist said: Personally, I just don't get the obsession with Bloodborne 2. I almost wonder if half of it is to get a chub at another Sony exclusive, lol. From Software has shown that they are way better at spiritual successors - at evolving, then just making sequels. Frankly, Bloodborne is way cooler as a one and done project, as a dreamland you never return to. And if you think Ghosts of Tsushima will fix your Souls-like hunger then I think you'll be disappointed, to me it's look a lot more like a Batman Arkham style game with a Samurai skin than a Soulsborne title. In fact, if Ghost fixes your hunger for a Souls-like than Sekiro will probably do that ten fold, it has almost the same exact gameplay as a Souls title just without the leveling up ... |
I never said there has to be a million Bloodborne sequels, but at least 1 or 2 sequels would be fine. From Software did that with Dark Souls and it worked very well.
No need to return to the same world as in Bloodborne 1, just like with each new Dark Souls a new world is not a problem.
As for Ghosts of Tsushima, yeah I still don't know exactly what the game is all about so I quoted it as an example. I ALSO quoted Nioh which is a very well done Souls like game. And since a Nioh 2 is in the works, that's where I'll turn my attention for the time being.
