By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HintHRO said:
OTBWY said:

I thoroughly disagree. Any Switch only user would have enough to play, even now. Especially if you don't have another system for indies and smaller studio games. Like I already explained, there are a lot more smaller games that maybe you don't care about, but others might. And as I recall, being a PS4 and Vita owner for a long time myself, Vita support dried up pretty quick so Sony focused basically on one system too. And I don't know if you recall, but the PS4 had very little "big" games until Bloodborne, aside from its launch games Knack and Killzone and Infamous later on. However, it had enough smaller games to fill the time for me. And it had a lot of remasters too. That was a period of maybe 2 years, but very similar.

When you look at PS4 exclusive games, the first two years were certainly weak. I can imagine this due to the advanced technology and scale of the games, but not with Switch, which is basically a portable Wii U. Even when Wii U just got released it was already underpowered. Nintendo also doesn't offer a decent 3rd party line up which PS4 did in the first two years. Right now and the coming year, besides random indie games, Switch isn't offering anything special from both Nintendo or 3rd party. 

It is nothing like the WiiU though. Totally different architecture and the Switch is more powerful. And what do you mean with decent 3rd party line up of the PS4? Do you mean the games that were also available on PS3 and 360? Like Fifa and Call of Duty? I don't think you looked at any games for the Switch past the first year, cause that is blatantly false.