NieR: Automata coming to Xbox One on June 26

[DonFerrari]

Chazore said:

DonFerrari said:

2) Have I said it was? Still you were the one that tried to say how it is called HERE (or is that here another place?) and still again as I said, I was explaining what I was calling platform holders, but you said I was deviating from the subject, have no idea why.

3) Again, if it wasn't worth for the platform holders they wouldn't pay for it. How you gone from that to saying when Sony do is good and others is bad I have no idea. Also if the developers or producers didn't think it benefited them they also wouldn't do. It may not benefit you as PC gamer or even not benefit gamers at large, but to say no one benefits is wrong since companies aren't imbeciles to keep doing things they think won't benefit them.

4) Sure there are other funders besides the big 3, not all game would be able to get them (I believe you mean crowd funding), considering the budget of AAA games and average crowd funding doesn't seem like they would be able to sustain multiple AAA games there... and most games get publishers without exclusivity... Have you seem where Sega talked about why Yakuza was exclusive to PS? Do you think they where lying?

2) When I said here, I meant where I come from, not here as in VGC the forum.

3)And again, I was talking about it being bad for the consumers and the game producer. It is bad when anyone does it, no matter how "successful" we coin one deal over another. 

I'm not even going to give a kudos to any of those deals falling through and gaining a benefit. I think they are all just as bad.

4)I mean more than just Crowd funding. We have 3rd party publishers and game devs that are becoming publishers like Chucklefish. AAA games can vary on what money is spent on them and where it goes into. Before MS bought up NT, they had actually proved what you can do with a decent budget and art style direction. They can exist and they can be made. They are not something only the big 3 can make either.

As for sustainable, no, we don't have to have a AAA game out the wazoo every week or month. So they can take their time making them over the years, instead of getting the masses to think we can just churn them out like Activision does with every CoD iteration on a near yearly basis. 

Have you seen where Sega just announced two Yakuza games and VC4 coming to PC, as well as Shenmu 1-2?.

2) And who is supposed to know that? Still it wasn't change of subject.

3) Yet you said it isn't good to anyone, now some caveats, ok.

4) Making an AAA game takes about 4 years to be made releasing every month or only every year. But I like your idea of it being better to have less games instead of having exclusives. I suppose it makes some logic for you to have 2 multiplats per year instead of 2 multiplats plus 10 exclusives and how it benefit gamers, would you care to explain it?