| DonFerrari said: Not changing any topics... you asked who benefited, my answer was platform holders because if it didn't they wouldn't purchase, and you asked who was a platform holder, I'm explaining what is a platform holder. If you didn't intend as a jab you wouldn't phrase singling out one fanbase defending one situation and attacking the other and them reiterating it. But if you say it isn't ok. |
We are deviating away from talking about timed exclusivity to "you're taking jabs at Sony, how dare you".
I asked because of the way you worded platform holder. Here it's worded as console company or "one of the big 3".
No, I've said before that it is bad when all of them do it. Then we ended up circling around to basically singled out one of the big 3 being allowed to do it and "earning" the right to egt away with it, it's definitely not MS and not Nintendo, so the only answer becomes Sony.
It isn't okay for either of them to make the deals and then defend them on it. Timed exclusivity is vile and bullshit no matter what excuses one pulls out of their backside.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
