By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

You are the only one twice implying it. That is why I said you were trying a stealth accusation of hypocrisy.

Consumers don't buy the exclusivity, they may buy exclusive products. Only platform holders can buy exclusivity.

And now we're changing the subject entirely, but putting focus on something that you think is a jab (why the hell would it be unless a fan took it very personally).

That makes no sense to what I said at the end about it being bad for everyone.

Is this the turning point where a mod now has to step in, because we're to become overly and purposely hostile?. Or are we going to get back on track and drop the "hypocrisy" and "jab" cards?. Your call, don't disappoint me. 

Not changing any topics... you asked who benefited, my answer was platform holders because if it didn't they wouldn't purchase, and you asked who was a platform holder, I'm explaining what is a platform holder.

If you didn't intend as a jab you wouldn't phrase singling out one fanbase defending one situation and attacking the other and them reiterating it. But if you say it isn't ok.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."