Chazore said:
Nah, not a stealth attempt, it's basically going to temp benefit the one who owns the game and slightly benefit the one making the deal. It's bad either way, let's not even begin to try making it excusable for one side, but worse when all the others do it. |
You are the only one twice implying it. That is why I said you were trying a stealth accusation of hypocrisy.
Consumers don't buy the exclusivity, they may buy exclusive products. Only platform holders can buy exclusivity.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
