By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 11 June 2018
Edit Thread
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

The only one that could possibly win from the timed exclusivity is the platform holder... and if a new IP or one that needed help to fund... all else is basically a loss.

By platform holder you mean the one who owns the game?.

I don't really buy into the funding card. Otherwise we're just getting knee deep in "it's okay when Sony money hats/funds something, but when others do it it's wrong".

Nope, I mean the one who buy the exclusivity. If it didn't benefit them they wouldn't do it.

Very nice stealth attempt of accusing Sony fans of hypocrisy.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."