By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer said:
DonFerrari said:

Certainly because they hate Nintendo, as show with them devoting a division for it.

It's a like another Wii  third party situation. Where everyone want to make money but unable to bring their mainline title to the handled. 

Could be. Still they could release those same games on all platforms. But before knowing what games they will create on the division it's hard to know.

RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said:

Your crystal ball is great for translating what isn't even said... but it contradicts Wyrdness's.

Nintendo fans have been complaining about lack of 3rd part support since at least GameCube... and GC sold poorly, Wii wasn't able to sell MPs, WiiU sold poorly and so far Switch is selling good but for AAA games usually much lower than X1 and PS4... strange this request for Nintendo fans, does your qualification for it starts only at Switch? And PC/X1/PS4 are platforms that sells, so those games not getting there would also be against what these so called Nintendo fans are asking right?

If you want to put hypocrisy on my posts you'll have to work harder. Because as I said in the previous post I have no issue with Switch getting more support even if other platforms get less support because of it (as SE making a exclusive division) I first pointed out that both announcements from SE contradicted each other. And if SE gets more profit without porting exclusives to X1/PS4 I don't really care, but that certainly goes against what Nintendo fans here have been defending... even more when you look all rejoicing with this announcement, while pretty sure they would attack SE if it was a division exclusive to X1 or PS4, as some here even attack companies when they avoid to do ports of games that the port wouldn't look good on Switch to the point of accusing Sony of paying to skip only Switch for MHW or that there is a conspiracy of all big 3 parties to kill Nintendo.

Wyrdness is wrong. There's nothing more to say about it.

It's abundantly clear that you are on a crusade against perceived hypocrisy. And again, Square-Enix isn't contradicting themself.

Yep, I don't like hypocrisy. I didn't said SE is contradicting itself, I said both reports as gave contradicts themselves.

Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:

So you do have a crystal ball to interpret that more multiplaform approach means PS4/PC/X1 without Switch? Seems your crystal ball needs to talk to Rol's because his says MP means PS4/PC/X1/Switch plus exclusives for Switch.

You're doing yourself any favours with this response as for one what Rol said is no different to what I said he just said it in a different way as currently SE are doing multiplatforms plus exclusives for Switch we have games like Octopath and Twewy for Switch only while multiplatforms like DQXI are also around. It's not a crystal ball it's a case of what's already happening and SE's own actions in opening a division dedicated to original Switch games only.

Nope, he was saying multiplatforms also going to Switch instead of PS4/X1/PC.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."