HollyGamer said:
It's a like another Wii third party situation. Where everyone want to make money but unable to bring their mainline title to the handled. |
Could be. Still they could release those same games on all platforms. But before knowing what games they will create on the division it's hard to know.
RolStoppable said:
Wyrdness is wrong. There's nothing more to say about it. It's abundantly clear that you are on a crusade against perceived hypocrisy. And again, Square-Enix isn't contradicting themself. |
Yep, I don't like hypocrisy. I didn't said SE is contradicting itself, I said both reports as gave contradicts themselves.
Wyrdness said:
You're doing yourself any favours with this response as for one what Rol said is no different to what I said he just said it in a different way as currently SE are doing multiplatforms plus exclusives for Switch we have games like Octopath and Twewy for Switch only while multiplatforms like DQXI are also around. It's not a crystal ball it's a case of what's already happening and SE's own actions in opening a division dedicated to original Switch games only. |
Nope, he was saying multiplatforms also going to Switch instead of PS4/X1/PC.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







