By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
DonFerrari said:
Strange that they would at the same time do this https://gamingbolt.com/square-enix-doubles-down-on-its-multiplatform-approach

Not that strange when the quote should be differently interpreted than it is in the article.

“Growth in the number of platforms is basically a good thing, and we intend to further advance our multiplatform approach,”

That's the sole sentence the article is built around, but what it most likely really means is that Square-Enix recognizes Switch as a viable console (hence "growth in the number of platforms") and therefore games that were planned to be multiplatform will aim to have a Switch release as well.

And advance multiplatform approach certainly makes sense of making a division devoted to Switch right? Even more because games made for Switch can't be ported to others.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."