DonFerrari said:
So you admit to be fishing using a strawman argument? Where did anyone besides you said any score that is far from average (that for you if 25 or 40 is the same, then 25 to 10 is the same and 10 to 0 as well right?) is troll (you are also the only one talking about fake review). You are the one changing definitions non-stop to try and make an argument stick, and have failed miserably at it. When you read the review for GTS and see how it is fake you come and use it. Because people here have read the Detroit and show why it's ridiculous. Are we discussing Angry Joe? Haven't seem his review cited here. And still Detroit wouldn't dwell on below average (also ignore that gaming average have been sitting about 70 as also show to you in other threads). No problem you watching Jim, just curious why you would watch negative reviews on a game you don't care on a platform you never play. Will you list the PS games you played yet? |
He already told you. There are plenty of people who watch a reviewer's videos (myself included, which is why I'm throwing my 2 cents in here) regardless of what they are playing, because they happen to like the reviewer. I watched the exact same video, and I have no problem telling you that I don't have a PS4. I didn't type "find negative reviews on Detroit: Become Human" into the YouTube search bar. I typed "Jim Sterling", because I happen to like listening to his videos while on lunch break or driving home from work. If you like the particular reviewer, the content doesn't have to be something you actually intend to play, or sought out, or even agree with for that matter.







