Labo is a huge ripoff and a waste of a great concept (so far)

[DonFerrari]

HoangNhatAnh said:

DonFerrari said:

Double standards come screaming at you.

I don't know the price of the PS2 games on PS4 because I don't buy them, but probably they are more expensive than what I would pay.

Good that you complaing about people defending PSVita in Gamasutra, that you haven't see me complain about PSVita, but excuse yourself for WiiU... PSVita is older than WiiU you know?

Because i mostly care about HH and Sony fans is HC so of course i have to mention both vita and ps4, also, with every good Wii U games come to a HH, i have nothing to complain since i don't play HC anymore. Older or not, vita still is the latest Sony HH so... 

All I hear is you saying you judge others for your own behaviors.

Biggerboat1 said:
Just to chip in here - first off I don't have any difficulty in believing that GOW cost significantly more than Labo to develop.

There are however other considerations, such as the shelf space taken by Labo. The retailer may demand a larger profit than they would for a game which takes up a fraction of the space. So we don't know how much of that extra 20 dollars (if we're saying that a reasonable price is the standard game price of 60) is actually going to Nintendo. The distribution will also likely be more expensive.

I mean, the PSVR Aim controller is $65 on it's own, without a game - do you honestly think it's costing Sony any where near that to manufacture...?

Consoles do take more space and have almost 0 profit margin.

And Accessories all have very overpriced history (no controller cost over 15 bucks to make but retail for 60... X1 pro controller is almost obscene).

Skylander also uses a lot of shelf-space but I never saw it hitting this high (which would also be obscene). And I don't think Nintendo is giving the store 50 USD of margin.