DonFerrari on 31 May 2018
| Soundwave said: Switch third party efforts don't need to sell on par with other systems, they just have to be profitable, I would bet Capcom is pretty happy with those Street Fighter and Megaman sales on Switch. If you look at the eShop rankings there is quite a bit of diversity for people who buy online (which is great for pubs because there's not retailer cutting into their profit), the top 10 isn't just Nintendo games. At retail for the time being Nintendo will dominate because they've brought big guns to the Switch whereas others haven't, but even then we are seeing third party software doing alright on Switch. Also no offence to the site, but we know VGChartz numbers can't be taken as gospel, they are estimates. |
Still, releasing 10% of the products and retaining 70% of the marketshare is to much.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
