By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation on 28 May 2018
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
Azzanation said:

Don, you still refuse to see the point. Regardless if the review is fake, a troll or whatever you like to call them, if its meant to rob or hype a company of success than they all should be taken into consideration not just the negative ones. Again Detroit has received 2 reviews giving it a 4/10 so how do you point them out as troll reviews?

Halo 4 - 87 Meta < Quarter to Three gave it the only red review of a 2/10

Forza Horizon 2 - 86 Meta Quarter to Three < gave it the only red review of a 2/10

The same guy keeps giving MS exclusives extremely low reviews, if you think a 4/10 is bad on a game sitting on a 79 Average than you must really open your eyes out there. I still enjoyed those games very much and couldn't care less how many 2/10s it got. A 2 is a lot worse than a 4, be thankful because it can be worse.

Get over it honestly.

Nope, you are the one that are trying to shape definitions (isn't the first time you have been verified to do it). Sure a bought review to hype a product is bad, can you prove it was the case for the 10 on GTS? Troll reviews aren't designed to rob a company of its success (you do use some out of place words), they are more likely used for clickbait.

Yes for me those 2 reviews from Quarter to Three (which is usually regarded as a troll reviewer) are trolling two very good games.

Still waiting for your list of exclusives from PS4 you can show you played.

Question: You ask if I can I prove to you the same case as the 10/10 score for GTS?

Answer: The same way you can prove that those 4s for Detroit are trolls.

I am going to leave it at your 2nd last sentence. 

As for your last sentence, If you want to debate off topic I suggest you PM me, if not leave it at that. I don't see how me playing games relates to this thread.