By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Errorist76 on 28 May 2018
Edit Thread
Azzanation said:
Errorist76;

Imho it makes a difference if the number strays by 20% from the middle, as in your GT example...or by 40%, as in Detroit‘s case.

Who makes that rule, You?

It’s called logical thinking.

 

Azzanation said: 
Hynad said: 

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

You never talked about 100...you talked about 95 for GT. That’s 20. at least remember what you wrote.

For Detroit the highest on MC is 95, that’s 16% higher than the average.