By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation on 26 May 2018
Edit Thread
Hynad said:
Azzanation said:

Are you also going to downgrade the 3 review sites that gave the game a 95/100? If so than your point is valid, if you are just going to nit pick the 2 low scores than you need to nit pick the 2,3 high scores as well.

In fact why even review the game, seems like everyone needs to have the same opinion, lets all just give the game a 9/10 because anyone else with a different opinion should not be allowed to review a game.

I am loving SOD2, I couldn't care less that its sitting on a 68 meta, just play the game if you enjoy it.

Why don’t you take on CGI-Quality instead?

I think they can both read my post. If I didn't want CGI to read my post I wouldn't have made it that obvious. Thanks for caring though. CGI is welcome to comment back if he wishes. 

DonFerrari said:

 

 

Azzanation said:

Are you also going to downgrade the 3 review sites that gave the game a 95/100? If so than your point is valid, if you are just going to nit pick the 2 low scores than you need to nit pick the 2,3 high scores as well.

In fact why even review the game, seems like everyone needs to have the same opinion, lets all just give the game a 9/10 because anyone else with a different opinion should not be allowed to review a game.

I am loving SOD2, I couldn't care less that its sitting on a 68 meta, just play the game if you enjoy it.

Azz as always you like to be wrong right?

If a game is hovering in the 80 range, a 40 review (which is one the broken level) is a more than twice away from the average than the 95, which even if probably much higher than perhaps it should can be understand as someone that really like the game (like if CGI-like was the reviewer) and the genre so he will be distorted higher.

For someone that say have too many great games to play and that his userbase doesn't discuss you enter to many discussion to defend MS and criticize Sony... shall we look at your comments on SoT reviews?

And about the ridiculous claim of everyone needing to have same opinion. For a game that is reasonably well done and doesn't have major flaws averaging 80, the 70-90 range with people liking and disliking the game (without making personal taste get in the way of the objective part) is reasonable. 40 is troll and clickbaiting level.

But I appreciate you infering I'm biased fanboy. You one of the most neutral person on the forums.

 

Way to spin my entire post. I honestly couldn't expect anything different from you so no I am not surprised.

This isn't about being bias, this happens to most games not just PS exclusives. Why do you care so much on these little things? No game is perfect and everyone has the right to there opinion. Its easy to pick out the negative reviews as trolls and easy to keep the extremely positive reviews that aren't trolls. Do you complain about the competitor games copping the same treatment?

Did you know Gran Turismo Sport sits on a 75 meta, did you call out Troll reviews to the 4 Reviewers who gave the game above 90 scores and 1 of those being the only 100 score? That's a bit high above the average correct? With your logic, there troll reviews as well correct? I cant recall you calling them troll reviews though.. interesting.

Like I said I play games no matter the meta score, I suggest you do the same. Also I cannot play my games at work, so ill definitely jumping on some the moment I get home, after I am done replying to these posts at work, oh wait.. you hate Phil for using Tweeter because his the boss and should be making games instead because his the developer and all, I guess because I am the boss at my work I am not allowed to use social media either because I should be making games or something instead of posting on VGC.. 

Bottom line, ignore the scores, just enjoy the games you like, that's what I do.

Last edited by Azzanation - on 26 May 2018