I'm tired of this overemphasis on diversity spilling into our entertainment.

[Slimebeast]

Torillian said:

Slimebeast said:
It's disgusting.

No matter where you look, almost everything is infested with multikulti now.

Drastic demographic change in society where native Europeans are soon in minority in their own countries, the increased violent crimes, the heavy financial burdens, the twisted morals of modern society where perversion is being praised and where criminals aren't punished. But this not enough for them.

On top of this deterioration of our societies, politicians, the public offices, academia and all the lying media have taken on as their mission to evangelize about the greatness of multiculture and force the population to not just accept but to embrace and praise the multicultural project. Dishonestly downplaying all the negative effects and shutting down and hunting every critic and dissident.

And even this is not enough. They won't even leave pop culture alone (although they're not leaving our cultural heritage and history alone either, just recently one publically funded Swedish scientist made the world news by claiming that Viking burial practice was influenced by islam so much that it became popular to weave Kufic patterns and islamic messages in cloth and to believe in muslim paradise, in the heartland of the Swedish vikings in Uppsala and Birka).

Wether it's remakes of old stories or new creations the pattern is the same no matter if it destroys the context. Multikulti is obligatory. Homogenous is forbidden even if it's historically accurate (see the controversy about BBC's black Achilles TV-sries, or the video game Kingdome Come lacking people of color in 15 century Bohemia as an example).

There just must be female soldiers or strong women doing any manly tasks, LGBT-people not just represented but remarkably visible, and obviously huge proportions of immigrants and people of color.

Modern culture and entertainment has become cynical, plastic, hollow and artificial. And extremely moralistic and preachy.

So what is your hypothesis on the origins of viking burial garments that have "ali allah" writen in them?  You appear to present only an argument of incredulity (I find it hard to believe so it can't be true) but if that's your only reason to disagreeing with their interpretation of the evidence you should rethink your own biases. 

No, the burden of proof is on the scientist who presented the theory. And her hypothesis has been debunked by other archeologists and historians already.

It was a ridiculous and unplausible theory to begin with. First, it's remarkable how the alleged text would have been intricately embedded in a popular Viking pattern of the 8th and 9th century Scandinavia in a quite hidden and unobvious manner. Further, the alleged words would only make sense and be readable if you had a mirror, which is overall very rare in history and probably unheard of in the time period and region in question. And the name "Allah" wasn't there even according to the scientist herself. If you could extract any word from the textual pattern, and you'll need a lot of wishful thinking to achieve that, it was "Illah", not "Allah".

And the fabrics with the common Viking patterns in question are from the 8th or 9th century, while the Kufic script that sparked her hypothesis to begin with didn't emerge until the 15th century.

It's extremely bad science and embarrassing.

But so desperately this typical Swedish multiculturalist wanted there to be muslim traces in our Viking heritage that she combed through dozens of old finds of fabrics and had to come up with such unlikely explanations. Our museums are filled to the brim with leftists like her, who feel that their primary mission is to diminish the history and heritage of Swedes while doing everything to make our immigrants feel included and feel they're part of Swedish history.

The only reason and motivation for this debacle is the brainwash of multiculturalism going on in Western society.