duduspace1 said:
1. My estimation and yours might not be the same, but we are both extrapolating using parameters of our choosing lacking any standard approach to estimations so I would call that even, however you have a right to disagree on that point. 2. Until you are able to estimate the 'Total cost' went into getting Labo into the hands of customers before jumping the gun and calling it overpriced, expect to be challenged when making such unfounded conclusions and to be enlightened as to where your tunnel vision lies in your analysis. |
1 - you haven't given any explanation to make your extrapolation reasonable.
2 - You were claiming it costs similar to GoW, still waiting for any evidence of it. I don't have to do your work for you. I doubt that besides you, anyone here really thinks Labo costs the same to make as GoW.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







