By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation on 26 May 2018
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
yvanjean said:

That why smart and informed consumers would actually read their reviews. Your only trying to discredit their opinion because people get emotionally attached to what they want the score should be. People writing these reviews are professional that have a reputation to maintain, they want go out f their way to make one bad review for click bait unless there where actually something they dint like with the game. They were probably over critical but they have a right to their opinion. Also, their two reviews have minor negative impact on ththe score once you get over 50 reviews. Once you played the game and read the reviews and a few other reviews by the reviewer ... then we can call in their questionable 40s review.

You must be living in a bubble to say reviewers are professionals that don't give scores for click bait....

I'll give one example... girl reviewed GT5 for a 4/10 with the justification that simulators are pointless and racing in circles is meaningless.

Are you also going to downgrade the 3 review sites that gave the game a 95/100? If so than your point is valid, if you are just going to nit pick the 2 low scores than you need to nit pick the 2,3 high scores as well.

In fact why even review the game, seems like everyone needs to have the same opinion, lets all just give the game a 9/10 because anyone else with a different opinion should not be allowed to review a game.

I am loving SOD2, I couldn't care less that its sitting on a 68 meta, just play the game if you enjoy it.