DonFerrari said:
1 - I asked for the cost to develop Labo, and you said you would gave after I gave you GoW. I gave you GoW 3 and why GoW PS4 would be on that ballpark. You gave Pokemon marketing cost as estimation for cost of Labo, don't try to dig your way out of it. Give the estimate cost for Labo in a way that at least makes sense. Because surely I didn't say that just being made by the same studio means same cost, I gave you much more than that. 2 - No I didn't say only graphics increase cost, I said they are the main source. You are still needing to show how the craftness of Labo had big cost involved. Because unless you think RPG Maker had a very big budget because it allows you to create you would be plenty wrong. And having a premium on the price doesn't change the cost at all. 3 - You are the one that have to defend your Labo pricing and cost (which you really didn't at all), not I am supposed to explain to you how Labo development cost work and estimate it for you. 5 - WiiU was considered overpriced as general here in VGC with the culprit being the Tablet. Overpriced no in a way of the retail price being much higher than the manufacturing cost (at first) but more on undervalue for the price, but then as tech should make pieces cheaper and Nintendo held the price (with justification in VGC being that they didn't expect sales to increase with price drop, which they can't really prove since it didn't happen) then it became overpriced in the way that the manufacturing cost was considerably lower than retail price (and for this a lot of Nintendo fans justify with Nintendo not selling HW at break even point because poor Nintendo is only gaming company and can't afford it, at the same time slinging dirty at sony being broken and profiting at total company less than Nintendo with only gaming... still Sony do sell HW at loss or break even).
Please make points that stand and you can source or explain, instead of just spinning around waiting me to prove everything to you. |
1. You did not give me the cost for GOW, you gave me that for GOW 3 and then extrapolated from that. I think it only fair that I should also give you an estimation in return. If it doesn't suit you that is fine, your GOW3 to GOW extrapolation also didn't particularly suit me anyway.
2. The only thing I need to show you actually is that you have currently shown me no alternative to Labo, if you did you would have a price to compare and justify your opinion that Labo is overpriced. Right now you are just making a lot of biased assumptions.
3. On the contrary, I don't have to. You are the one making an accusation of overpricing so the burden of proving that lies with you. Nintendo is 'so to say' innocent until proven guilty by you.
5. Again a lot of this is your personal opinion doled up as 'general opinion'. As far as I am concerned Nintendo gave up on the Wii U a long time ago and decided to make the Switch, by the time components were becoming cheaper enough to drop prices, there was nothing to be gained by dropping prices because the fate of the Wii U was long determined by then.