areason said:
No it isn't. While you can argue that TFA had the advantage of being the first star wars movie in a long time, and didn't have the disadvantage of a bad prequel, TLJ also had the hype of the return of Luke, as well as the advantage of not being an introduction to a new trilogy. |
Very true. It also opened only ~15% lower than TLJ WW. If there had been no fan backlash, it would have most likely stayed around that range. So, it should have made ~$1.7B-$1.8B. In fact, BOM said that $750M-$830M at the DBO was the safe bet. Hell, it even performed worse than my most pessimistic prediction of being ~$600M down. Instead it was ~$735.7M down.
It amazes me the lengths supporters of this new Disney set of films, or the messages they are trying to push, go to ignore a major fan backlash, when all the evidence is staring them in the face.
Mar1217 said:
They also got the passion of an actor who's the perfect fit for the role so it kinda helps to make it work :) |
Agreed.







