duduspace1 said:
That is precisely my point hence why I gave the example of GOW. Value is in the eye of the beholder. Let those willing to pay for Labo do so and simply say it is not your own particular kind of gravy. Not try to say people are stupid for their pricing of something an individual has no interest in. At the end of the day, Labo is outselling GOW in Japan which would suggest they believe it is worth that amount more than GOW is worth its price. Labo might not be doing as well as some currently think it should but there is no basis to attack it on its pricing. Anything can be attacked on pricing because our value systems are different. |
So if we can let those willing to pay why shouldn't we let those willing or wishing to complain or label it a rip-off do it? He didn't say people are stupid, he said Nintendo is ripping them off.
Yes sure, GoW have sold so much every entry in Japan right?
Some? You are pretending to live under the rock to not see the high expectations not being met in several places as reported in VHC?
There is basis for attack and you just ignored it. Or do you see production cost and value put in those softwares to validate the pricetag?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."