peachbuggy said:
WhatATimeToBeAlive said:
Why are you making foolish arguments when you can't even accept what the reviewers say about those LABO-games? You should instead tell why those games are better than what the reviewers and I think. It seems you can't do that. It doesn't make my, and the reviewers, arguments baseless just because I am not a fan of "gimmick/non-gaming" -focus. And I think that several Nintendo games are worth more than majority of other games.
And then there is the 80 dollar price tag. The games didn't cost a lot to develop and the cardboard is cheap, so there is a huge amount of extra in the price. Would you defend this product if it was published by Activision/EA (or any other company)? I don't think so. So can you make better arguments than calling someone biased?
|
If the game was worth $5-10 as you state then you'd think at least 1 of these reviewers you speak of would have given it a negative review, when reviewing the product as a whole, on metacritic. Unfortunately for your argument, not a single one has! Where are these magical reviewers you speak of?
|
The games are worth 5-10$ in my opinion (if they for example were sold on Steam), and the reviewers have said that they are very bare-bones and lack longevity and variety. Do you think that they don't, and what would you pay for them?
