By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
duduspace1 said:
HyrulianScrolls said:

Yes, the software is as basic as it gets. I can't fathom how it could be valued at anymore than $20 absolute max, more than likely less than that. So what are they charging that extra $50 for? The cardboard I guess, and therein lies where my "ripoff" claims come from. 

I think you should reexamine your conclusion on the pricing of the software. A software that enables creativity on the scale labo does is worth every penny it costs.

It may not be for everybody but it is for those able to use it. I can turn your logic on the head by saying a game like GOW is not worth its price because I can get some Blueray  animated movies for less than £20. Depends on what you are pricing is it the play portion or the creativity/building portion.

One could arguee what the average costumer will get from the game or value productions.

Still he is talking about his opinion, and anyone can think any product is a ripoff. And when price is so much higher than cost that opinion is very plausible.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."