Mr Puggsly said: You're arbitrarily deciding what is "pleasing." |
Sure am. As I am judging it by what I find what is pleasing and not by anyone elses standards. Problem?
Mr Puggsly said: Uh huh, there are people complaining the PC version of Rage is a mess. I'll just end on that. |
And it was. But the console versions weren't exactly perfect either.
Mr Puggsly said: That's the great thing about PC gaming, unique problems for all of us! |
And you can actually play your games forever despite hardware/software changes!
Mr Puggsly said: Not a ton, certainly not standard. Resolution can only go so far in boosting performance, depends how the game is designed. |
I just listed a heap prior. Which means... Your statement holds no water.
Mr Puggsly said: Your example is bad. |
And your rebuttal is even worst and inconsequential to the argument at hand.
Mr Puggsly said: I arbitrarily decide what's "pleasing" visuals. I will argue with people who have different opinions, that's what I do. If people feel 7th gen graphics were pleasing, they're objectively wrong. Because my PC is great, end of discussion. |
Yeah. Try being a little less sarcastic... And a little more constructive. You might actually get somewhere.
If you can't handle that the PC has superior visuals and eprformance to consoles... You should probably stop playing video games entirely.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--