By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Snoopy said:
Pemalite said:

Black Ops 3 on 7th Gen.

Hence why I played along.

Which has what to do with your incorrect logical fallacies?

Indeed. You are entitled to do so, even when your position is errant and/or fallacious, but I am also allowed to call you up on that.

Depends on the type of business and the business model they thus employ.
However.
If you think that building a single player component into Call of Duty is suddenly going to blow costs out the wazoo, making the game unprofitable when some games in the series are shifting 30+ million copies, selling 20+ million copies of map packs, with a sprinkling of additional Microtransaction sales on top... Then to put bluntly. You are kidding yourself.

Really no excuses financially for removing a single player component, it's the Single Player that got Call of Duty recognized back in the day as it was that very component that allowed the franchise to be set apart from the competition.

 

1. Again, what major COD doesn't have a single player campaign.

2. Then why so serious?

3. You were being a hypocrite that's why.

4. You didn't call me out on anything with logic yet.

5. The goal of a company is maximizing their profits. You shouldn't do anything just to make people feel good unless it results in more money.

Ugh, so we're now at the point where people are defending companies releasing incomplete games for full price all in the name of "dem prahfitz!"? 

This is why scumbag companies get away with cutting and charging pieces of their games and intentionally watering down their games to scam people into spending more money on shoehorned-in microtransactions (I'm looking at you, NBA 2K18). 

Knowing Activision, though, they might sell it later at an additional cost.