Currently Online 
| TranceformerFX said: Crytek, for all intents and purposes - was a one trick pony. This game is a testament to their video game design philosophy. 10 years ago, this game was every PC Elitists worshipped deity. |
Except it wasn't. Are you forgetting FarCry as well?
| TranceformerFX said: Now it's nothing more than an example of how to polish a game to perfection while ignoring everything else that makes it an actual video game. This game was so bare bones and by the book in terms game play variety and engagement. Besides stellar graphics, Crysis brought absolutely nothing new to the table. |
You are free to your opinion, personally I felt the freedom Crysis offered was a breath of fresh air when games were getting more linear and confined.
| TranceformerFX said: I remember Bioshock for 2007, not Crysis.... |
Really? Because I think of 2007 as the year of Halo 3, the biggest game of that year that smashed all the records.
That doesn't mean we can't recognize the likes of Bioshock, Crysis and so on... They are all solid titles.
| fatslob-:O said: <SNIP> Sad to see Crytek become irrelevant at the forefront of cutting edge PC technology this generation ... |
It is their own fault.
I guess we can hope they can pick up the pieces and get back on the horse at some point.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
