By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
Azzanation said:

Well you did. You clearly stated MS has no chance of destroying Steam which than you anwsered with MS can buy out and absorb (highly unlikely) which will destroy Steam as a competitor. Anything is possible. 

They dont have to be better to win. Much like the most successful car companies don't make the best cars. Money talks. 

If i misread your post please explain what you meant by EEE strategy and your point of not capable of destroying Steam?

I said MS could actually "buy out and absorb" Steam?.

 

It's like you want to hear said words, but I mentioned their EEE strategy. I didn't say they would use and be absolutely successful in using it against Steam. I merely mentioned that nothing has stopped from them holding onto said strategy. 

Actually they do. Being lesser than Steam doesn't win you the golden medal, nor does it serve to take away a massive chunk of it's userbase. No one else has bothered to take on Steam, in such a way that it would deliver a massive blow to their userbase and eco. 

So you say there incapable of destroying Steam but mention this EEE strategy? Thats were i am confused. I dont know of this EEE strategy unless you are referring to absorbing there competition.

I agree its highly unlikely Steam will be absorb by MS but nothing is impossible. People can sell out, platforms can change etc. Steam tried to be successful without Windows and it failed quite badly. This is coming from me who loves Steam. Look me up if you have to.

Also your gold medal does not exist. Theres no trophy for selling more consoles/OS/software. People flock to whats more common and easier not whats the best. Being lesser is all about how compeitions work. Remember LG who were lesser and Samsung who were lesser, or even Toyota? Being lesser doesnt reflect the future at all.

Not always are the biggest brands in the world make the best products.

Last edited by Azzanation - on 01 May 2018