o_O.Q said:
you seem to be confused to me at one point you state that "sexualization" is inherent to the human body " back in the day an ankle could be seen as sexual. Personally, I think a person can be sexy no matter how they appear clothed or nude." but then you state that its bad for the media to "sexualize" if the human body is inherently sexual which you appear to have implied... then sexualization based on what i understand of your statements is unavoidable in advertising that includes people |
Yep its unavoidable, its natural to have sexual feelings. But its intent that matters. The media and mainstream porn showcases bodies that are impossible. Clothed people, partially clothed people, or nude people shouldn't be seen as a bad thing. If people saw more clothed or naked bodies naturally without all the added editing, then I believe society would be better off.
