By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
Hynad said:

LOOOLLLLL!!!!!!

You're saying the manufacturer doesn't know what the product they made is? What they say their own creation is isn't valid?

And what you say should be deemed valid over what Nintendo says... because?

But seriously, why the heck are you even arguing over this in the first place? If it's not due to some silly and meaningless agenda of yours, then what?

Just saying, the validity of claims cited by first party sources comes into question and it's why journalists frown upon using first-party sources ... (it's a conflict of interest type of thing)

@Bold Mostly out of past evidence (internal battery, integrated display, form factor design) but I don't really care if you'll take my word for it or not ... 

I only argued to defend my initial proposition on here ... 

So if a car company releases a hybrid car, but journalist didn't yet write about it to confirm it to be indeed a car, you won't take the words of the car company when they say it's a car?