fatslob-:O said:
Just saying, the validity of claims cited by first party sources comes into question and it's why journalists frown upon using first-party sources ... (it's a conflict of interest type of thing) @Bold Mostly out of past evidence (internal battery, integrated display, form factor design) but I don't really care if you'll take my word for it or not ... I only argued to defend my initial proposition on here ... |
So if a car company releases a hybrid car, but journalist didn't yet write about it to confirm it to be indeed a car, you won't take the words of the car company when they say it's a car?







