By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
flashfire926 said:
DonFerrari said:

2 - You don't care because it didn't fit to your point anymore.

5 - All your points were your opinion, so?

2- The article is talking abou NOW, everyone else is talking about NOW, I am talking about NOW. You want to include the past? Fine, then PSN loses by default because it got hacked numerous times, including a 6-week period in 2011, where people's indentities and credit cards were at huge risk. If we talk about the Past, the gap only gets bigger in favour of xbox.

5- are you saying backwards compatibility is an opinion? It exists, and that's a fact. Same with game pass, digital returns, and whatnot.

2- yes, but my initial answer to you was about historic and you just ignored it and then backpedal

5 - the relevance is opinion and the other points you put as strengths were also opinion. If you want to dismiss opinions then don't ask to not be called out.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."