flashfire926 said:
2- I don't care what you're talking about. I'm talking about what happening right NOW. 5- that's your opinion. |
2 - You don't care because it didn't fit to your point anymore.
5 - All your points were your opinion, so?
Pemalite said:
It technically is superior to the Playstation Network.
Master Chief Collection was and still is a buggy mess.
That is a significant discrepancy all things considered.
If you already own the games on Xbox, it doesn't make sense to ignore that library and purchase them again on PC. |
Yep, and I'm kinda grateful for Sony to keep their published titles cheaper than the third parties in Brazil and competition (won't include Nintendo because their lack of representation makes several of their games to retail over 300), at the time conversion rate was at about 4:1 we were getting games "cheaper" than USA since the 200 was already with all taxes.
The price of the PC games may have changed since I don't follow it closely, but several of the titles I plan on getting my friend usually talks about them very near launch at obscene low prices on PC version.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."