o_O.Q said:
OhNoYouDont said:
I should not be surprised at the impotence of your sophistry and yet I am.
You demonstrate a fundamental misapprehension about what it means for something to be normalized as well as when causality is involved. Your examples that were an effort to produce support for your ideas instead promote your abject obliviousness to the topic and only further advances my point. A book depicting unsavory actions is no more causally linked to sexual exploitation as grand theft auto is to...well, grand theft auto. It's a resoundingly debunked idea and you would do well to take note.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180116131317.htm
As to study, again you fail miserably at understanding the point. (Ignoratio elenchi fallacy)
Were rape normalized as is your claim, then the language would make no impact. Because it did have an impact, we can safely state that is it not the case that rape is normalized.
Will you learn this time or continue defending an absurdity? Judging from our last encounter I expect more red herrings and perhaps another statement about technology.
As to technologies which do not produce waste, you've apparently never heard of green technologies which is quite frankly shocking. Do you go outside ever?
Anyway, the argument was never about technology and waste. It was specifically about your claim that waste is intrinsic to technology, which is fundamentally incorrect as any waste would be a byproduct and thus extrinsic. So again I see you fail to grasp knowledge most children comprehend.
|
"It's a resoundingly debunked idea"
the notion that media has an impact on our behavior has been debunked? can you post some evidence of that?
"Were rape normalized as is your claim, then the language would make no impact."
behavior is what is being studied here... not language
the fact that they admit that they would coerce women into having sex with them is the problematic aspect of this study, not whether they responded differently based on the language
its kind of gross that you missed that point btw
"As to technologies which do not produce waste, you've apparently never heard of green technologies which is quite frankly shocking."
lmao green technologies do not produce waste?
ok narrow this down to one type and lets have a crack at this lol
"which is fundamentally incorrect as any waste would be a byproduct and thus extrinsic."
lmao we've been through this before and i can't believe that i apparently have to again
waste is a part of the essential nature of technology, meaning that its intrinsic to technology
maybe with green technology you'll finally be able to prove me wrong so name one type and we'll see what happens lol
|
