By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Medisti said:
DonFerrari said:

No one said these people can't find it appealing.

The thing is they try to put as cartoon = good art direction, realistm = no art direction, just copy and paste reality.

And the other thing is that they use their preference of art direction to determine that the graphics of one game is better than another and even more when talking about it technically and saying a game of that caliber is possible on said nintendo hardware.

I don't really care either way personally. It's all about the game feel for me. Story and graphics are a bonus, if good, and ignored if not.

If you don't care why were you answering on it?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."