CrazyGamer2017 said:
It seems odd to me that one is required to "engage" when starting a thread. I mean one can say everything one has to say about any given topic in one post. I don't understand the logic behind making an engagement in the thread as a mandatory requirement. Now don't get me wrong, in actual threads I personally always end up engaging as I think of new things to add to the debate or as I try and debunk attacks, agree or disagree with others etc.... It's just that making it a requirement seems a bit odd. Perhaps I should ask the question the other way around: What harm is there in starting a topic and not adding any more to it? Especially if the other people keep the thread alive? It's not like your lack of engagement would kill the thread if other people keep it alive. |
The world is full of people that spend all their time trying to control other people. It's just the way it is. My advice? Just stop making threads if that's a "rule" around here. I personally didn't know it was frowned upon either but now that I know, I'll make damn sure to no longer make threads.
