By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness on 15 April 2018
Edit Thread
Hynad said:
Wyrdness said:

I already posted what Doom requires but it seems you ignored the post. Effects like FOV, motion blur, a new form of AA known as temporal super sampling, better lighting effects, higher quality shadows, good quality particle effects, reflections, well implemented DOF effects, compute shaders, higher quality decal, higher quality occlusion, higher quality textures and animations, physics and so on. DQXI doesn't use many of these even when you compare effects in play in both games like lighting and shadows Doom beats it out but a high margin.

What's ironic is your claim that fps means more demanding is further shot down when you factor in the dynamic resolution of Doom while DQXI is at a set resolution, you simply failed to acknowledge the were a tonne of factors now you're here trying to one with smiley faces in true commando fashion while crying that you've been flamed.

You do realize that not having a dynamic resolution when aiming for a given performance puts a different strain on the hardware, right? 

You do realize that you just admitted that Doom does make compromises to reach 60fps. By having its resolution dynamically change to accommodate the targeted framerate. Right?

From the get-go, I was the one saying there are tons of factors to take into account. You were the one who said compromises weren't required. 

Look at the strawman specialist in play he doesn't even remember the argument now, you said earlier DQXI is more demanding than doom because of the fps which we all know is complete bullocks. Not once did I mention Doom not needing to compromise visual fidelity to achieve 60fps at this point your desperation is present in trying to fabricate arguments to save face.

I said earlier that with optimisation DQXI could reach 60fps while still looking the same (not compromising visual fidelity) get your head out your ass because now I'm just going to be you're as clueless as the man in the white house here and trying to employ the same tactics as the said clown. The pure fact that you've gone down the route to start making shit up up to save face of your uninformed statement from before is not only outstanding but one I'll pull your card up on even if it leaves you bitter for months to come no wonder you post smiley faces and such in your replies that foolishness has more standing than pure fabrication and twisting.

You're here trying to make demands like some forum mogul but have not displayed a single thing detailing how DQXI is more demanding than Doom all you've done is make an awful declaration on 30fps and have danced around the debate like some fairy trying to look like you have some ground. From the get go your post was DQXI is more demanding because it runs at 30fps that is what you posted if you knew the were other factors you would never have posted it because you would have know that fps is one of a tonne of factors so don't give me that rubbish as after your card got pulled up on it you disappeared like Batman in the Doomsday fight and left VG to carry the debate and he actually brought something to it unlike you who vanished than pops up to post smileys perhaps you should stick to that.