Does Sony need an exclusive multiplayer!?

[JRPGfan]

Miyamotoo said:

JRPGfan said:

Do they really need it?

Smash is big, but Street Fighter is akin to that and its done by a 3rd party.
Splatoon is big, but again a single Call of Duty is bigger (and you get 1 each year), again done by 3rd party.

They dont need to, 3rd party probably love that they dont have to compete against sony in this area too.
It might be why its easy for them to get these 3rd on their systems (because 3rd know they ll sell gangbusters)

Basically first thing that I wrote is that they don't need it, so I dont see why you replied to me.

Because you wrote you found it Strange they didnt have a big exclusive multiplayer only game.
Why is it strange if it doesnt make sense for them to do so?

This is one of the reasons MS if not winning the gen, it focus's on multiplayer games (a role 3rd party already fills really well) and its lacking in other genre's.

It makes much more sense for sony not to follow down that route, and instead stick to their strengths (esp when no one else on the market does what they do), those Single player experiances cant be gotten else where, Nintendo & MS dont really do game like them, its a reason to buy a Playstation, while Sony makeing some Online Multiplayer game, probably wouldnt be.

ei. = its not strange, its smart (imo).