By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
flashfire926 said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope, in my eyes you claim only OP said it, but more said, where you lying then? And again as originally said on the other thread what WAS the consensus not what currently is.

See? You had to backtrack on your previous statements now. That means you you admit Sea of thieves metascore doesn't mean a "bad" game.

Case closed.

You must have a very strange reading issue...

Not backtrack on anything, go to SoT thread and see that I was saying during the discussion that VGC community have (indication of past) considered 80 as average at most and below to be bad score.

And I haven't ever in any thread said the metacritic score define if the game is bad or good, what I said there and in other places is that the SCORE is considered bad.

You may close your eyes and case all you want, won't change reality.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."