By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 07 April 2018
Edit Thread
flashfire926 said:
DonFerrari said:

I agree with you and would be totally ok with the score using the full scale more often... but for games they score like if it at least can be played it already get over 50 on metacritic....

The gaming score seems like the dance of famous on Brazil TV or the Carnival where the minimal acceptable score is 95 (only total catastrophic get as low as 80) and even 99 isn't very much liked.

I have read, you should as well, and won't be a single person.

So in your eyes the very small minority is the consensus rather than the very big majority that is saying otherwise......okayyyy 

Nope, in my eyes you claim only OP said it, but more said, where you lying then? And again as originally said on the other thread what WAS the consensus not what currently is.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."