sundin13 said:
No, that last sentence does not in any way excuse any of the things you said. You cannot blame a woman for getting raped and then think that everything is fine because you say the man should get punished too. You are still saying that the woman is at fault for being raped. You have presented quite possibly one of the clearest examples of victim blaming I have ever seen someone seriously push, and again, right before using a metaphor comparing a woman to purchasable goods. And you further double down later: "But you said "I DO", so yeah, take some responsibility if you say "I DO"..." Just let that sit for a moment. In this context, you just said "take some responsibility for GETTING RAPED". There is no weaseling out of those statements. You can say "laws should protect the victim", but at the end of the day, you are still throwing up that asterisk which says "but it is still their fault". |
Yeah, except I NEVER blamed that woman getting raped to begin with. I never said she's at fault either, so yeah there goes your argument.
and you are making up stuff, where did I say take responsibility for getting raped??? I said and very CLEARLY take responsibility for getting married in the first place.
Again like I said to others, if you are going to change words and read "rape" where I write "marry", you are making this convo impossible.
Also I'm not weaseling out of NOTHING. You even said I'm doubling down which I am because I know what I said, you simply choose to read what you want to read then you judge.
But I'm NOT backing out of what I said, I will triple down if I have to. and if you and others don't get it then too bad for you guys. What's next? me saying Germany is a nice country and you accusing me of defending nazism?
