Bristow9091 said:
Yeah and it's all down to reviewers lol, it's weird how differently games are scored on Metacritic as opposed to films... seems like I see more films hovering around the 50 region that are considered average, whereas with games anything below 75 for some people is considered utter trash, there are even those who won't even touch a game if it scores below 80, which I find a little absurd, they could be missing out on some really great games, you don't always have to agree with reviewers, lol. The way games are reviewed is something I really disagree with, and it's also why I very rarely look to reviews to determine whether I want to buy a game or not :P |
I agree with you and would be totally ok with the score using the full scale more often... but for games they score like if it at least can be played it already get over 50 on metacritic....
The gaming score seems like the dance of famous on Brazil TV or the Carnival where the minimal acceptable score is 95 (only total catastrophic get as low as 80) and even 99 isn't very much liked.
flashfire926 said:
But that's literally only one person- the OP.
Read some of the replies. |
I have read, you should as well, and won't be a single person.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."