Dark_Feanor said:
Hiku said:
You can see the person who made the comment edited it from Pascal to Tegra. Not the most specific poster.
Doesn't rule out that Semiaccurate didn't specify Maxwell though, and the poster who even at first confused it for Pascal just didn't mention that part.
I can probably find a more specific post. This was literally the first hit that came up on Google. But I'm not interested in doing more research until you answer my question.
I ask again, why do you say these are unsupported claims? Based on what?
Do you just say that randomly? Or is this actually based on some proof where their claim has been debunked?
Also keep in mind that it costs 1000 dollars to access this article. If they charge that much for their information, they're either very confident in having provided correct inside info in the past, or it's a very over ambitious scam.
|
This.
They are a scam. And not even a good one. That is way I am so baffled so many sites and Youtube channels are falling for this.
I belive it is a thirst for news this time of the year. It is just click-bait inside click-bait.
|
They might be right on the devkit spec and devkit availability on developer, but it's not the final spec, and just prototype. what i don't agree with them because, they just assume that it will be released based on the devkit availability. If they just assuming PS5 release year based on devkit availability alone. Then PS4 and Xbox One should have been released on 2011 not 2013. And also they are not considering that periods time on game making, marketing, final build for costumer, bug codding and etc etc.
